The uvex CO₂ footprint

To help achieve the goals set out by the European Green Deal on climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest, the current emissions must first be calculated so that subsequent potential savings can be identified. To determine transparency of our products' greenhouse gas emissions throughout the entire supply chain and to provide our customers with a comprehensive view of their company's carbon footprint, we calculate the products' CO₂ footprints. uvex calculates the CO₂ footprint of products using the measurement method specified in the ISO 14067¹ standard.

For independent verification of our measurement method and corresponding CO₂ footprint calculation, we prepared a calculation report of the uvex 1 G2 planet safety shoe. The method was performed in accordance with ISO 14067 and the report has successfully passed a compliance audit. We chose the safety shoe for testing as it is our most comprehensive and complex product. All products are calculated in the same way as in this method.

Due to the inherent complexity and variability of PCF calculations, the carbon footprints calculated following our methodology are not intended to be directly compared to PCFs of other organisations.

^{1 The ISO 14067 standard is the basis for the procedure of developing a ‘Product Carbon Footprint’}

An overview of the different uvex safety product categories is provided in the following table:

Product categories

Category	Examples of Products:
Eyewear	Spectacles
Head	Helmets, visors, Respiratory protection, Hearing protection
Gloves	Safety gloves
Footwear	Safety shoes
Occupational Health	Prescription glasses

On product level (e.g., T-Shirt), individual products may differ depending on gender, size/width or color. In line with EEB (2021)1, we base our calculations on a uniform size (see next table). Similarly, we calculate Footwear-PCFs for one width only. While we do not differentiate between sizes for unisex products (or products with uniform sizes), PCFs are calculated separately for men and women in case these products are sold in substantial volumes. Further, we do not differentiate between colours.

Representative product

Representative Product	Women*	Men	Uniform Size
Eyewear			x
Head			x
Gloves			9
Footwear	38	42

*for relevant products only.

1 EEB (2021). Draft Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) Apparel And Footwear. Zugriff am 09.07.2024. Link: eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Draft-Product-Environmental-Footprint-Category-Rules-PEFCR-apparel-and-footwear.pdf

The system boundary defines which process are to be in- and excluded when conducting PCF calculations.

All relevant processes that a product goes through are taken into account for the calculation.

We distinguish between two principles:

• cradle-to-customer: Calculation from raw material to customer.
• cradle-to-grave: Includes the cradle-to-customer calculation and extends beyond the useful life to include disposal.

More specifically, the following table provides an overview of the system boundary of cradle-to-customer PCFs.

System Boundary of cradle-to-customer PCFs

Included	Excluded
✔ Raw Materials	✖ Wastewater Treatment*
✔ Auxiliary Products	✖ Employee Commuting**
✔ Energy Consumption	✖ Business Travel**
✔ Process Losses	✖ Packaging (Tertiary2)*
✔ Transportation (Raw Material to Final Customer)
✔ Packaging (Primary & Secondary1)

* no relevant impact
** not product-related

Additionally, cradle-to-grave PCFs include use phase emissions. This is only relevant for workwear, however (washing cycles). In line with EEB (2021)³, no use stage (e.g., for cleaning) is dedicated to footwear products. Further, cradle-to-grave PCFs include emissions that relate to the final waste treatment of the sold product.

For included processes (e.g., raw materials), we aim to include all data that relate to a product, i.e. to avoid omitting (=cutting-off) material or energy data. Therefore, if all data is readily available, no cut-off is applied. However, in some cases, the acquisition of data that is only of minor importance to the overall result would represent a disproportionately large effort. Even though we do not define a fixed cut-off percentage (e.g., 1% as used by the International EPD System (2021)⁴), the cut-off value will approximately be in this range. Depending on the process, the cut-off percentage refers to weight (i.e. materials) or GHG emissions (e.g., tap water).

1 Primary Packaging: material that immediately covers the product; Secondary packaging: containment of primary package
2  Tertiary Packaging: packaging used to facilitate transport of sales units (e.g., pallets)
3 EEB (2021). Draft Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) Apparel And Footwear. Accessed 09.07.2024. Link: https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Draft-Product-Environmental-Footprint-Category-Rules-PEFCR-apparel-and-footwear.pdf
4 International EPD System (2021). General Programme Instructions For The International EPD® System. Accessed 09.07.2024. Link: https://www.datocms-assets.com/37502/1617181375-general-programme-instructions-v-4.pdf

According to ISO 14067¹, a functional (declared) unit is the reference unit for quantification of a (partial) PCF. This means that all data used to model the PCF relate to this unit.

For instance, to calculate electricity-related coating emissions of gloves, the factory’s total electricity consumption needs to be broken down to kWh consumed per pair of gloves (i.e. the functional unit).

Functional Unit

Aspect	Description
What?	Representative Product
How much?	For Products typically used in pairs (e.g. Gloves): Pair Otherwise: Single Product
How well?	Wear in good condition with appropriate use for the given product
How long?	A product's lifetime with appropriate use

1 The ISO 14067 standard is the basis for the procedure of developing a ‘Product Carbon Footprint’

Waste treatment is considered in two stages: Firstly, losses during manufacturing along the value chain are treated as waste in the country where they occur. Secondly, at the product’s end of life, final disposal is considered in the country, where the majority of the products is sold (default: Germany). To account for the emissions associated with waste disposal, we apply predefined waste scenarios available in our Life-Cycle-Assessment (LCA) software SimaPro¹. These scenarios consider how – on average - different materials are disposed of in different countries (e.g., x% landfill, y% incineration, z% recycling for a certain material). Further, different material-specific emissions are taken into account with their specific disposal types (e.g., incinerating 1 kg of PUR has different emissions than incinerating 1 kg of paper). Thus, the overall waste emissions are specific to the product’s material composition and country where it gets disposed of.

1 SimaPro is a leading LCA software that allows organizations to analyze the environmental impact of their products or services.

If electricity is procured with accompanying contractual information (e.g., guarantees-of-origin) or own renewable energy plants are present, the specific (renewable) electricity mix is chosen. Otherwise, a country-specific grid mix is selected from the Ecoinvent¹ database.

1 The Ecoinvent database is a comprehensive life cycle inventory (LCI) database which contains > 18.000 datasets containing industry-average emission data

Allocation refers to dividing environmental impacts between different products’ life cycles. This is necessary in case a process produces more than one product (=multifunctionality) or in case of recycling.

Allocation: Production Data

To attribute activity data from own operations or suppliers (e.g., energy/material consumption) to a single product, the relevant activity data is divided by the number of pieces produced – if possible by taking into account the varying energy/material intensity across product lines (e.g., different energy consumption for different glove types during coating).

Allocation: Cut-off (End-of-Life & Recycling)

When modeling the emissions of recycled materials, allocation is necessary. This necessity arises from the need to divide the environmental burdens between two interconnected life cycles: virgin vs. recycled material. Thus, it is necessary to define where one life cycle ends and where the other life cycle begins. To do so, we follow the simple cut-off-approach as described by Ekvall et al. (2020)¹ (not to be confused with a cut-off percentage as discussed in the section dealing with our system boundary). Thus, the environmental burdens of virgin material production, recycling and waste disposal (E) are calculated as follows:

E=1-R1xEv+R1xEr+1-R2xEd

Where:

• E = environmental burdens of virgin material production, recycling and waste disposal
• R1 = share of recycled material in the product
• R2 = rate of recycling of material after use in the product
• Er = environmental burdens of the recycling activities that supply recycled material to the product.
• Ev = environmental burden virgin material
• Ed = environmental burden waste disposal

In words, the cut-off approach sets the boundary between two life cycles at the point where the waste material is collected for recycling. Therefore, recycling materials reduces the carbon footprint of both virgin material (by avoiding its end of life treatment) and recycled material (by avoiding raw material production) (see figure below). The life cycle of recycled material starts when the waste material is collected for recycling. Therefore, recycling processes should be included in the product where the recycled material is used.

1 Ekvall, T., Albertsson, G. S., & Jelse, K. (2020). Modeling recycling in life cycle assessment.

When calculating PCFs, not only CO₂ but also other greenhouse gases that are emitted along a product’s life cycle are considered. To better compare the different greenhouse gases, they are converted into CO₂ emissions and presented together with the actual CO₂ emissions as CO₂ equivalents (CO₂e). The conversion factors are currently taken fromIPCC 2021 GWP 100a¹ (100-year time horizon Global Warming Potential) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Following ISO 14067², all GHG emissions shall be calculated as if released at the beginning of the assessment period. In this line, biogenic carbon temporarily stored in products is omitted for both cradle-to-customer and cradle-to-grave PCFs. Further, we follow an attributional approach which, in broad terms, aims to estimate a product’s share of the global GHG emissions (Ekvall, 2019)³. Since this relates to emissions that have physically occurred, avoided emissions are not part of the PCF. This is also in line with the GHG Protocol (2011)⁴ which does not allow for a subtraction of avoided emissions. Similarly, offsets are excluded from the inventory (as demanded by both ISO 14067 and GHG Protocol).

Notably, all PCF results relate to their respective functional/declared unit and, as such, do not contain information regarding impacts on areas of protection (e.g., damage to ecosystems as a whole), the exceedance of thresholds (e.g., planetary boundaries) or other risks.

1 IPCC 2021 GWP 100a is a method of calculation in accordance with the latest research
2 The ISO 14067 standard is the basis for the procedure of developing a ‘Product Carbon Footprint’
3 Ekvall, T. (2019). Attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. In Sustainability Assessment at the 21st century. IntechOpen.
4 GHG Protocol (2011). Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard. Accessed 09.07.2024. Link: ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Product-Life-Cycle-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613.pdf

As data quality of emission factors and activity data is heterogenous, inventory data collection always involves evaluating data quality.

We prioritize data quality as follows:

Data Hierarchy

Rank	Data Type	Description
1	Primary (Site-Specific) Data	Data Specific to Own Value Chain
2	Secondary Data	Industry-Average Data
3	Proxy Data	Approximation Based on Similar Activities/Materials

 

Primary Data

To most accurately represent a given product system, site-specific data shall be prioritized. Following ISO 14067¹, this refers to data which are obtained from direct measurements within the product system. Thus, this includes measurements from our own plants and measurements reported to uvex by our suppliers. In our own plants, this includes recording waste figures, energy consumption and production figures. It is particularly important to know the individual production steps so that the carbon footprint can be represented as comprehensively as possible. Changes in the result are possible at any time if a general value is replaced by a supplier's more accurate value.

As these measurements mostly refer to energy consumption, generic GHG markups (relating to e.g., buildings, auxiliary materials) based on similar Ecoinvent² datasets are added wherever possible. Given that calculation rules are not universally harmonized, site-specific data (especially emission factors) need to be treated with care. If data quality of emission factors must be questioned (e.g., due to implausibly high or low values), own re-calculations based on activity data are preferred. Notably, in case of multiple suppliers where data is available on different quality levels, the site-specific data with the highest quality is chosen and used as a proxy for the other suppliers. This way, suppliers delivering higher quality data (which may lead to higher emission factors) are not penalized.

Secondary Data

If site-specific data are not available or not plausible, secondary data derived from the Ecoinvent database are used. The values in the database are averages for common materials and cannot be broken down to a specific manufacturer's product. These are therefore only general values. Nevertheless, the database is ‘live’ and regular updates ensure that additional data is added or known data is adapted. This means that changes to the result are possible at any time.

If no matching dataset is available, emission factors from scientific studies or environmental product declarations (EPDs) are used. If emission factors relate to a precursor product only, subsequent production processes are accounted for, if possible (e.g., energy consumption from PAN to carbon fiber).

Proxy Data

In case the abovementioned steps did not yield an emission factor, the activity is either omitted (if irrelevant for the final result) or proxy data (approximation based on similar activities/materials) is used.

The following table depicts the data sources and hierarchy in greater detail:

Data Sources by Activity

Activity	Required Data	Data Source and Hierarchy
Materials	Material Emission Factors	1) Supplier Data*; 2) Ecoinvent; 3) Studies/EPDs
Materials	Weight of Product Components	Weighing or Calculation**
Manufacturing	Energy Consumption	1) Supplier Data*; 2) Ecoinvent
Manufacturing	Energy Emission Factors	1) Ecoinvent; 2) Federal Environment Agency (UBA)
Manufacturing	Auxiliary Materials Consumption	1) Supplier Data*; 2) Ecoinvent
Manufacturing	Auxiliary Materials Emission Factors	Ecoinvent
Manufacturing	Process Losses (%)	1) Internal Data or Supplier Data***; 2) Ecoinvent
Transport	Distance & Mode Inbound	EcotransIT
Transport	Distance & Mode Outbound	Default: 1000 km by Lorry
Transport	Transport Emission Factors	Ecoinvent
Sales	Fuel Consumption	Internal Fuel Data
Use	Washing Cycles	EEB (2021)3
Use	Emission Factors	Ecoinvent
End-of-Life	Disposal Emission Factors	Ecoinvent
End-of-Life	Disposal Mode	SimaPro Waste Scenario

*preferably own modeling based on supplier activity data
**calculation e.g., for packaging materials that contain more than one product
***depending on value chain position of losses

Software

To calculate the CO₂ footprint of a product, we use the SimaPro⁴ software package with the Ecoinvent database. This contains life cycle inventory data on energy, materials, transport etc. Using this software, various factors such as materials, production processes, transport routes and methods as well as a disposal process are selected and put together to form a total component. The result including background processes is now calculated using the data obtained.

1 The ISO 14067 standard is the basis for the procedure of developing a ‘Product Carbon Footprint’
2 The Ecoinvent database is a comprehensive life cycle inventory (LCI) database which contains > 18.000 datasets containing industry-average emission data
3 EEB (2021). Draft Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) Apparel And Footwear. Accessed 09.07.2024. Link: https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Draft-Product-Environmental-Footprint-Category-Rules-PEFCR-apparel-and-footwear.pdf
4 SimaPro is a leading LCA software that allows organizations to analyze the environmental impact of their products or services.

In our customer communication we use the cradle-to-customer calculation, as we currently have no influence on the disposal process and can only speculate about the waste scenario (CO₂ emissions vary widely depending on this). Therefore, we only show the cradle-to-grave value on the results data sheets. These sheets contain all the important information, which can be used for presentation to the customer.

Results are grouped into the 6 categories i) Material, ii) Manufacturing, iii) Transport, iv) Packaging, v) Use (if applicable) and vi) Disposal. For each product category, the following table provides more detailed information on the emissions falling into each category:
 

Product Category	cradle-to-grave
	cradle-to-customer				Use	Disposal
	Material	Manufacturing	Transport	Packaging
Eyewear/Visor	Materials used in different Components (e.g., Polycarbonate Granulate)	Processing of Materials to Produce Components (e.g., Injection Moulding of Polycarbonate) & Waste Treatment of Losses	Transport of i) raw material/components to final manufacturing site  ii) final product to customer (incl. sales markup depending on product category)	Production and Transport of Primary and Secondary Packaging Material	not relevant	Waste Treatment of final Product
Gloves	Liner Material and Knitting; Coating Material	Coating Energy & Waste Treatment of Losses
Footwear	Upper and Bottom Materials	Upper, Toecap, Insock, Midsole, Outsole, Insole Manufacturing & Waste Treatment of Losses
Workwear	Fibres and other Materials (e.g., Steel for Eyelet)	Further Processing of Fibres (Spinning, Knitting, Weaving, etc.), of other Materials (e.g., Forming of Hook) & Waste Treatment of Losses			Washing
Swedsafe	Plug Materials, Consumables during Manufacturing (e.g, Mould), Components (e.g., Cord)	Plug Manufacturing & Waste Treatment of Losses			not relevant
Respiratory Protection	Materials used in different Components	Energy Consumption of Tier 1 & 2 Supplier & Waste Treatment of Losses

Emissions Grouping by Product Category

Important: Calculation methods are constantly revised and subject to change. It is possible that a different method may be used to evaluate our calculation at any time and that different results will be obtained from the same calculations. It is therefore important to include the method used and the calculation date in the communication.

Presentation on the uvex website

The presentation of the result on the website will appear as follows. For support and more detailed data, the results data sheet can be used for communication with the customer.

When displayed on the uvex website, values for each category are rounded to 2 (3 for plugs) decimals and the rounded values per category are summed up to arrive at a cradle-to-customer value. To avoid rounding deviations, also PCF results communicated via results data sheets are rounded in the same way.

ISO 14026 describes the requirements for PCF communication. General communication requirements include (among others) stating the life cycle stages included and reassessing the PCF in case of changes to calculation methodology, product or manufacturing processes. Further, footprint communications shall not imply a general “environmental friendliness” as the PCF looks at greenhouse gas emissions only. Business-to-Consumer communication further requires to 1) provide supporting information and explanatory statements to facilitate consumer understanding, 2) clearly state where supporting information can be found and 3) publish information on how the consumer can reach out to uvex.

Supporting Information (=this document) refers to a report in line with ISO 14044:2006, 5.2 that includes details relating to goal, scope, life cycle inventory, impact assessment, analysis and critical review (if applicable). It shall be easily accessible and free of charge (e.g., web link).

Explanatory statements are short statements that shall ensure that the footprint is not misunderstood. They can refer to the supporting information. To account for that, the following  sentence is accompanying every footprint communication: “Legal notice regarding carbon footprint: Calculation method: IPCC XXX¹ GWP 100a (based on ISO 14067) SimaPro XXX ecoinvent database XXX. Scope: cradle-to-customer. These CO₂ values are valid at the time of calculation and may be subject to change. More information can be found at uvex-safety.com/carbon-footprint”

1 “XXX” refers to the current version

In theory, comparative footprint communications can be made a) on another organization’s product or b) on an organization’s own product.

For all comparative communications, quantitative information and an explanatory statement are mandatory. Further, all relevant (and the same) stages of the life cycle need to be taken into consideration by all footprints used for comparison. Different products shall only be compared if the PCFs follow the same calculation and communication rules.

A comparison with products of other organizations is only allowed if the basis is either i) a single underlying comparative footprint study that has undergone a critical review in accordance with ISO/TS 14071 and covers the footprints of all products to be compared or if ii) the footprints have been determined by different footprint studies that have undergone a critical review according to the requirements of the same footprint communication program, following the same product category rule (PCR)¹ (developed in accordance with ISO/TS 14027), given that the footprints compared are based on consistent data (e.g., same databases).

As these conditions are currently not fulfilled, our PCF results cannot be compared with PCFs of other organizations (see table)

Requirements for comparisons with products of other organizations (ISO 14026; 6.9.3)

Options	Requirements	Comment
Option A: PCFs from single comparative study	Single underlying comparative footprint study (of all footprints compared) that has undergone a critical review in accordance with ISO/TS 14071	not done: would require joint study with other companies
Option B: PCFs from different studies	Critical Review acc. to same PCR & footprint communication program	not done: costly, time-consuming & for many products there is no PCR available
	Consistent data	difficult: different studies and databases used across companies
No Comparison with products of other organizations possible

 

When the comparison of a product’s footprint with itself over time (performance tracking) is communicated, the main factors contributing to changes of the footprint need to be stated. Communication of performance tracking can be done when changes in the footprint occurred through, e.g., improvements of own/supplier production processes, change of suppliers, improved eco-design, etc.

1 PCRs foster comparability by ensuring an a) identical functional unit, b) identical criteria for inclusion of inputs/outputs, c) equivalent system boundaries and data description, d) same data quality requirements, e) identical life cycle inventory units and calculation procedures, f) equivalent allocation rules, g) identical impact categories and characterization factors and h) equivalent footprint communications (format, content)